update,

tunmnlu/projects/presentation/comment.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Good presentation. Still lacking specifics and could really flesh out plan. Questions, strucutre, timeline all look good aside from that.; More work and effort is needed for the literature review to show the current approach and justify the innovation. Also more detail is needed on what algorithms you are going to use and how you measure your success. | Heilmeier Questions [45/45]: All questions answered to the point. | Literature Survey [12.5/15] | Innovation [5/10]: Again, very sparse on what innovation, uniqueness, model type; [-5] only mentioned about the innovation on application without covering the algorithms and visualization | Plan of Activities [7.5/10]: [-2.5] There is a well planned activities however it does not mention what each group member will do. | Presentation Delivery [20/20] |